Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Dirge-like' anthem hitting the wrong note

Clare Garner
Monday 12 August 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If the Fabian Society has its way, Britain will kiss goodbye to the "dirge-like tune" that is its national anthem and march into the next century singing a stirring song by Andrew Lloyd Webber.

Paul Richards, author of the left-wing think-tank's controversial document Long to Reign Over Us?, has called for a Eurovision Song Contest-style event to pick alternatives. "God Save the Queen", which "doesn't mention Britain, or even England once", is "more about bashing the Scots than anything else," he said.

The prospective Labour candidate for Billericay and member of the Fabian Society Executive Committee wants a new "exultation of nationhood" with words by the Poet Laureate, Ted Hughes, and music by Lloyd Webber, to be commissioned to mark the millennium. He also suggests the English should have a separate anthem - "Patriotic hymns such as 'I vow to thee my country' or 'Jerusalem' would fit the bill admirably," he said.

"Britain's national anthem is something of an embarrassment in a modern age, not least because of the dirge-like tune," he said. "For a start it is an English song, not Welsh or Scottish or Northern Irish. Scotland and Wales have their own anthems 'Flower of Scotland' and 'Men of Harlech', both robust celebrations of slaughtering the English."

The situation really hit home during Euro 96 when "a lot of people" were embarrassed "that we didn't have a good, strong song with which to support our side other than 'Football's Coming Home'", he said.

Lloyd Webber was not inclined to tinker with the national tune. His spokesman, Shimon Cohen, said he had "no interest whatsoever" in the "very silly idea". "He's a monarchist, he's very loyal to the Queen and has no complaint whatsoever with 'God Save The Queen'." A senior Labour Party spokesman called the suggestion that the national anthem may change "sheer fantasy". And Ted Hughes declined to comment at all.

The constitutional expert Vernon Bogdanor felt that a little fine-tuning was all that was needed. "The one I like best is the Benjamin Britten orchestration," he said. The Tory peer and novelist Jeffrey Archer said he would be loath to change the present anthem. Having heard the recent Russian and Australian efforts at revision, he said he would prefer to "stay still".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in