Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Diet campaign is rejected despite warning on poor

Liz Hunt,Health Editor
Tuesday 23 April 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government yesterday rejected plans for a multi-million pound healthy-eating campaign as experts warned that improving the diet of the poor was the only solution to the chronic illness and early death in this group.

The Low Income Project Team, an off-shoot of the Government's own Nutrition Task Force, said that dietary factors were to blame for the higher rates of heart disease, strokes, cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure, lung and digestive disorders, and obesity among the less well off.

In a second report, also published yesterday, the Task Force recommended a campaign to persuade people to eat more bread, pasta, rice, fruit and vegetables, and fish, funded at pounds 3-5m a year for up to five years. The Government dismissed this, claiming that it was for other sectors to "grasp the marketing opportunities presented by the quest for healthy eating".

The National Food Alliance, an independent consumer watchdog, immediately questioned the Government's commitment to Health of the Nation targets for improving diet. It also criticised ministers for banning discussion on benefit levels by the experts compiling the report.

The Low Income Project report said: "Many of [the diseases] can be argued to have a dietary component in their causation which is consistent with the differences in food consumption between social classes, such as lower consumption of whole grain cereal products, fruit and vegetables and lower intakes of dietary fibre and anti-oxidant nutrients."

It said that some people on low income, often young mothers, went without food regularly."Young householders, the unemployed, those on benefit payments or very low incomes, especially those living in local authority accommodation with rent or fuel deductions from benefit payments, have the greatest difficulties and the worst diets," claimed the LIPT.

The report concluded that infants in low income households were less likely to be breastfed and had a higher prevalence of anaemia. Toddlers had higher intakes of saturated fatty acids and sugar and lower intakes of dietary fibre and vitamins. They had slower growth, more were overweight and suffered tooth decay.

Children aged 10 to 15 had lower intakes of most vitamins and minerals and suffered lower levels of activity and bone mass, plus more anaemia.

Pregnant women had lower energy and nutrient intakes and higher instances of anaemia, still births and low birthweight infants. Older people had lower nutrient intakes, poorer immune systems, and higher rates of illness and death for most diet-related diseases.

The second report by the Nutrition Task Force - its last after being set up two years ago - detailed 21 recommendations for improving the nation's diet, most of which were accepted apart from plans for the new promotional campaign.

Copies of the Nutrition Task Force Report, Eat Well II, and the Low Income Project Team Report, are available from the Department of Health, PO Box 410, Wetherby, LS23 7LN.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in