Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Dentists paid to endorse toothpaste

Marie Woolf
Sunday 10 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DENTISTS' professional associations are making hundreds of thousands of pounds a year by "selling" their names for use on toothpaste tubes. They charge manufacturers up to pounds 22,000 for a logo which shows that the toothpaste has been scientifically approved.

Dozens of products, including Aquafresh, Macleans Tooth Patrol Gel, and Colgate Triple Cool Stripe, carry logos that reassure the consumer about the products' credentials.

MPs and consumer groups believe that shoppers should be told that organisations such as the British Dental Association and British Dental Health Foundation are making money from the use of their names, rather than offering them free as a public service.

Last year the BDA, which uses top dentists to assess manufacturers' claims, made pounds 137,000 from its endorsement scheme, of which pounds 50,000 covered its costs. The BDA pays expert dentists pounds 600 a day for their opinions. The BDHF has approved more than 280 products since 1991. In 1998 it made pounds 250,743 from its accreditation scheme.

A spokesman for the BDHF said it ploughed excess money back into health education. But one of its publications says that the accreditation system was a great success "both for the financial security it has afforded ... and the service it provides for the public."

"If you were a major brand it would cost you around pounds 10,000 for accreditation for the first year and pounds 10,000 for the second," said a BDHF spokesman.

Manufacturers say that the logos are hard to obtain and that dentists' panels frequently refuse to back up the manufacturer's claims. "The accreditation scheme shows that the claims have been independently substantiated for safety, efficiency and quality," said a spokeswoman for SmithKline Beecham, which makes Macleans.

The BDA, which represents dentists in the UK, says it is not "selling its name". "Our aim is to cover our costs and the other surplus is for education and scientific work," said a spokesman.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in