Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A dentist is being taken to court by his colleagues because he has continued to treat new fee-paying NHS patients despite a practice decision to ban them, writes Liz Hunt.
Vrajesh Ruparelia, 31, was served with an injunction preventing him from treating the new patients last Friday. His colleagues, Andrew Moszczynski and Suzanna Hobday, who work at the Old Police Station practice in Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire, claim that Mr Ruparelia is in breach of an agreement.
The case, the first of its kind according to the British Dental Association, signals another development in the deteriorating relationship between the NHS and dentists. Thousands of dentists are "de-registering" NHS patients - more than 800,000 since 1991 - or refusing to take on new ones because of a dispute with the Government over NHS fees and plans to reform the dental service.
Patients in parts of London and other major cities and those living in rural areas, particularly the South-west, are finding it difficult to register with an NHS dentist. None of the three other dental practices in the Tewkesbury area accepts new fee-paying NHS patients, although they will provide state-funded treatment to children and people on benefits.
Mr Ruparelia, who is lodging an appeal against the injunction, said: "It is difficult to make any comment. I have to defend my position and inform patients what is going on but I am not able to say anything else."
He is continuing to see patients but has been forced to employ his own receptionist. Previously, the three dentists, who are "expense-sharing partners" (independent practitioners who share premises and costs) used the same receptionist and practice manager.
Mr Ruparelia's solicitor, Paul Hughes, described the action as a "restraint of trade" and said his client was being prevented from earning a living.
Mr Moszczynski and Ms Hobday declined to comment yesterday, saying in a statement that the matter was sub judice.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments