Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LIZ HUNT
Health Editor
A dentist who campaigned for 20 years to win the right to use the title "doctor" yesterday dismissed claims that some practitioners would use it as an excuse to raise their fees.
Dr Douglas Pike - the General Dental Council's decision to permit use of the title is effective immediately - said that his sole aim was to bring Britain into "harmony" with the rest of the world. Dr Pike, who practises in Sudbury, Suffolk, said: "We are primary healthcare workers just like GPs. We prescribe drugs, take biopsies and X-rays, and our training is very similar."
Dentists who wish to use the title must ensure that the words dentist, dental surgeon, or dental practitioner, are also used in close proximity. Some dentists said it would too expensive to name plates on their premises and letter-heads. "It really isn't worth the hassle," said one.
The GDC earlier this month voted to delete a paragraph from its guidance in Professional Conduct and Fitness to Practice, known as The Red Book, which precluded dentists from being called "doctor." Legal advice had indicated that the paragraph - the GDC's interpretation of Government legislation - was not necessarily correct, according to Amolak Singh, general secretary of the General Dental Practitioner's Association, and a member of the GDC.
At a council meeting on 14 November, 35 members voted in favour of deleting the offending paragraph, with nine against, and five abstentions. Objections included the suggestions that it was a "grandiose", or even a "self-elevating" gesture.
The British Medical Association said it had no objection to the move. "We are fairly relaxed about it," said a spokesman said who declined, however, to offer congratulations.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments