Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NIGEL DEMPSTER, the Daily Mail gossip columnist, has had a conviction for drink-driving quashed after he told a judge that he was scared of blood and needles.
He had insisted that the phobia, which at times had forced him to hide under seats, was why he refused to give a blood sample to police.
Mr Dempster, 56, told Knightsbridge Crown Court yesterday that he had even worked in a hospital as a porter in his teens in an attempt to cure himself. "But it only got rid of my fear of dead bodies. My fear of needles of blood was heightened," he said.
The court heard that the society diarist, who chronicles the lives of the rich and famous, was initially stopped for speeding in west London last October. Police officers had said that Mr Dempster, who admitted drinking two tumblers of orange juice earlier that day without realising it had been laced with vodka, smelt of alcohol.
A test showed 45 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath - which is 11/2 times the legal limit. He was then asked to provide a specimen of blood but refused, citing his fear of blood and needles.
A doctor who examined Mr Dempster and questioned him decided he had not been telling the truth and therefore had no clinical grounds for declining the police request.
Magistrates, who later convicted him for drink-driving, refused to accept his explanation. They banned him from driving for a year, fined him pounds 250 and ordered him to pay pounds 350 costs.
Counsel argued that the conviction went against "the weight of the evidence".
Judge Timothy Pontius said that considering what Mr Dempster had told Dr Grant Winstock, the police medical examiner had been "seriously wrong" in reaching his conclusion.
"Much court time and public expense" could be saved if police accepted urine samples more readily, he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments