Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Dealer loses sex bias case

Wednesday 24 June 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A WOMAN money dealer in the City of London yesterday lost her claim for sex discrimination against the British branch of Denmark's leading high street bank.

Julie Edghill, 39, of Sevenoaks, Kent, had claimed that male dealers at the London office of Den Danske Bank had "ostracised and isolated" her and made suggestive remarks about her appearance.

But an industrial tribunal dismissed her claims as "unreasonable and vexatious" after a three-day hearing in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk.

Mrs Edghill, who now works for another bank in London, was ordered to pay part of Den Danske Bank's legal costs. Lawyers estimated the total bill at more than pounds 50,000.

Christopher Ash, the tribunal chairman, said Mrs Edghill had come "nowhere near proving sex discrimination against the bank" and her claims that she was unfairly paid less than male dealers doing similar work were unacceptable.

"We are satisfied that they [the bank's employees] did not consciously or unconsciously seek to treat the applicant less favourably by reasons of her sex," said Mr Ash. "We are not satisfied that the applicant at any stage was ostracised, isolated or sent to Coventry by the other dealers."

He added: "The applicant has not succeeded nor indeed has got anywhere near establishing that she was discriminated against on the grounds of her sex."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in