Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Crackdown targets violence and burglaries

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PATRICIA WYNN DAVIES

Political Correspondent

Michael Howard's proposals, outlined to the Tory party conference yesterday, would see the end of automatic early release for prisoners, a tough new sentencing regime for violence and sex offences and, for the first time, minimum sentences for burglars and hard-drug dealers.

To the longest standing ovation of the conference so far, the Home Secretary declared that under White Paper proposals covering England and Wales, to be published next year, "model prisoners" would get a little time off their sentences for good behaviour.

"Everyone else should serve their sentence in full ... no more half-time sentences for full-time crimes," Mr Howard said. The final shape of the crackdown will be decided after consultation on the as yet uncosted White Paper, and included in a crime Bill in the parliamentary session after next.

But under radical new proposals for the sentencing of serious violent and sexual offenders, Mr Howard said there was a "strong case" for saying that anyone convicted for the second time should automatically receive a life sentence. These prisoners would only be released when they no longer posed a risk to the public, he said, adding: "If they continued to pose a risk, life really would mean life."

The White Paper will suggest that burglars and hard-drug dealers be subject to minimum sentences on a third offence - reflecting the American "three strikes and you're out" policy. Mr Howard said: "Burglary is a foul crime. It defiles people's memories." He added: "The same is true of dealers in hard drugs. They prey on the young, the lonely and the vulnerable."

Mr Howard told last week's Police Superintendents' Association annual conference that he was "surprised" at a survey showing that only 10 per cent of first-time burglars were jailed by magistrates' courts. In crown courts the average sentence for burglars with 10 or more previous convictions was 17.6 months. A new minimum is likely to be several years more. The move could bring some lower sentences, because of the abolition of early release and because some might sentence at the minimum. While conceding that risk at a briefing for journalists, Mr Howard insisted that the overall effect would be stiffer sentences. At present, the only minimum sentences are the mandatory life sentence for murder and the one-year automatic ban for drink-driving.

The maximum sentence for serious violent and sexual crimes is life imprisonment. But, said Mr Howard, offenders did not always get life, and could offend again. Under the Home Secretary's proposals, the net would be spread widely, imposing a life sentence for second offences of attempted murder, threat or conspiracy to murder, manslaughter, infanticide, and manslaughter due to diminished responsibility.

The same would apply to wounding or any other act which endangers life, rape, going to a crime equipped with a weapon, and unlawful sexual intercourse or incest with a girl under-13.

t Police chiefs want much of the country's criminal law - some of which they believe is "legal gobbledegook" - to be rewritten into plain English. They believe that vague and confusingly written laws have led to wrong judgments and made the legal system inaccessible.

Chief constables are to press ministers to introduce changes to the wording of the laws, many more than 100 years-old, in England and Wales and introduce a single criminal code.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in