Court usher's son served on six juries
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.STEPHEN WARD
Legal Affairs Correspondent
At least five more cases heard by a "professional juror" were being reconsidered by court officials yesterday after the Court of Appeal freed a man he had helped convict of burglary.
The juror was called in repeatedly by his father, a senior usher at Stoke Crown Court, to make up the numbers.
Last night the Court Service, which was given agency status by the Lord Chancellor's Department last year, was checking the records of other trials where the juror was co-opted.
The defendant, Frederick Salt, 25, who had served 13 months, will be entitled to claim compensation for wrongful imprisonment. His convictions for burglary and assaulting a policeman were quashed because the usher's son, who had served several times, would be likely to be an expert who would influence other jurors.
Details of other cases heard by the juror have not been made public, but according to a source at the Lord Chancellor's office the Court Service was planning to tell any defendants convicted by the "professional juror". They would be able to seek leave to appeal, and the Court of Appeal might free them or order a retrial. If freed they would be able to claim compensation.
Although the appeal judges ruled that the father and son must not be named, it emerged during the hearing this week that on at least six occasions at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court the young man had been called in to fill in when there was a shortage. Jurors are paid pounds 44.8 a day, plus pounds 4.25 meals allowance and up to 36p a mile travelling allowance.
Mr Salt was represented by Antony Longworth, who said the juror was summoned to attend court after it was realised they were one short of a jury panel in June last year.
Lord Justice Staughton refused an application for a retrial on the grounds that it was not in the public interest.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments