Court puts children out of the swim
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Seven children yesterday failed to make legal history and take their council to court over a broken promise to build a leisure centre and swimming-pool.
A High Court judge ruled the seven, from Colliers Wood, south-west London, could not seek judicial review as their case was "bound to fail". Acting through their parents, the children, aged three to 14, argued that planners erred in law when they struck a shopping-development deal with Sainsbury's which dropped the leisure-centre project. The alternative amenities included a restaurant, bingo hall and fitness centre but not the pool they wanted.
The original deal between Merton Council and the supermarket firm in 1986 included the leisure centre as part of a Savacentre project at Colliers Wood.
Richard Gordon QC, for the children, accused the council of creating an unlawful "hotchpotch" involving planning rules and regulations.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments