Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Council's homes challenge

James Cusick
Tuesday 09 December 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

John Prescott was last night facing a legal challenge over a decision to force West Sussex to accept the building of 12,800 more homes than planners think the county can bear. While the Environment Secretary is battling in Kyoto to save the planet from global warming he was accused of "concreting the countryside" back home.

The Government has issued a directive to West Sussex requiring the council to increase the planned level of new housing in its structure plan from 37,900 to 50,700 by the 2011. An independent panel which endorsed the council's lower figure said the character of West Sussex was "at a critical point".

Announcing the application to the High Court for a judicial review, the council chairman Ian Elliott said more homes would have a devastating effect on the countryside. "The 30,000 people who would live in the extra homes ordered by Mr Prescott would put even more pressure on the road network and significantly add to environmental pollution.''

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in