Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Council fail to stop alleged drugs dealer using "dirty money" to buy his fortified council house

Tuesday 30 July 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A council failed to stop an alleged drugs dealer using "dirty money" to buy his fortified council house yesterday. The Court of Appeal held it was bound by previous legal rulings to reject Bristol City Council's attempt to prevent the tenant taking advantage of the Government's 1985 right-to-buy legislation. Unless it succeeds in an appeal to the House of Lords, the council now faces the prospect of having to transfer the freehold of the house to the man, who is currently in prison awaiting trial on drugs charges which he denies.

Lord Woolf, Master of the Rolls, said the tenant's application for a court injunction enforcing his right to buy was heard and granted by a county court judge before the council's intended claim that he should be evicted because of his criminal operations. "Reluctantly and after some heart-searching", the court was bound to follow legal precedent to the effect that, once a secure tenant had established his right to buy, the landlord could not stop him by pleading public policy or hardship to other tenants.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in