Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Costs alert for lawyers

Stephen Ward Legal Affairs Correspondent
Wednesday 28 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lord Woolf, in charge of the biggest shake-up of the civil courts this century, warned lawyers yesterday that in future they will be expected to give a budget in advance for costs and be forced to stick to it.

The Law Lord appointed two years ago to improve the slow and expensive system is due to make his recommendations this summer. The Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, has promised to implement them.

Lord Woolf told a seminar of lawyers in London last night that under the present system the costs of cases were often out of all proportion to the amount of damages being argued about. "We want to try to control what work is done and to give that work a budgeted cost."

He said he was confident lawyers were sufficiently skilled to provide and work within accurate budgets. It would be for judges to "hold the ring" and decide how much should be spent.

He also said there would be a bias built in to new guidelines in favour of those who settled cases without going to court.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in