Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cosmetic surgery robs women of their smile

BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY The science of sincerity t Why the women in some families go to war t Tricks that age can play on memory

Cherry Norton Social Affairs Correspondent
Tuesday 21 December 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WOMEN WHO have plastic surgery to remove the lines around their eyes are losing the ability to smile properly, leaving them with an air of insincerity, a psychologist said yesterday.

Research presented to the British Psychological Society's London conference found that when people look at someone smiling, their focus immediately moves to the areas around the eyes known as "crow's-feet" or "laughter lines" to establish whether the smile is genuine. No lines would indicate a fake smile and lots of lines a true expression of affection and warmth.

Dr Carl Senior, a cognitive psychologist from the Institute of Psychiatry in London, said his findings suggested that evolution has "hardwired" people to look at the crow's-feet as part of their survival instincts. A true smile would indicate a friend whereas a fake one, an enemy. "Someone who is threatening you, whether they are smiling or not, tends to have their eyes wide open and so would not have any lines," he said.

Dr Senior also believes crow's-feet may serve as an important communication tool to indicate social appeasement and willingness to co-operate. Smiling is thought to have evolved as a signal of submission in the face of a threat. "When you smile genuinely your eyes are more closed and so you are less likely to start a fight and more likely to be trying to appease someone," he said.

A genuine smile, is known as the Duchenne smile after the observations of the 19th-century anatomist, Duchenne de Boulogne, who electrified muscles on a patient who had facial paralysis. He established that when people smiled properly the muscles around the eyes contracted.

Many women who have multiple plastic surgery, such as Jocelyn Wildenstein (known as the Bride of Wildenstein for her extensive, and according to her ex-husband "grotesque" plastic surgery), look very doll-like. Whereas those who accept their laughter lines, such as the actor Martin Clunes, may have more appeal.

"If there are areas of the face that people respond to automatically, then taking these areas away by plastic surgery may make people look more fake," Dr Senior said.

Dr Senior conducted eye movement experiments on 63 volunteers who looked for five seconds at pictures of happy, sad and neutral faces. The person's eye movements were monitored using infra-red, corneal-reflection techniques, which recorded where they looked every 50 milliseconds.

The results showed that when someone looked at a picture of a smile, they spent twice as long looking at the corners of the eyes as they did at the mouth, and went back to it several times during the time allocated.

They are more likely to repeatedly return to the "Duchenne" area of the face for pictures of people smiling than for sad or neutral faces. More than a third of the volunteers' eyes returned to the crow's-feet of the happy faces compared with 18 per cent for neutral faces and 13 per cent for sad faces.

"The findings show that humans are showing a hardwired response to the Duchenne marker which may have evolved to distinguish the genuine smile," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in