Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Corner stones of history a `myth'

Roger Dobson
Wednesday 24 March 1999 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ONE OF the most famous odysseys of prehistoric man may never have happened.

For more than 70 years, the popular theory surrounding the building of Stonehenge has been that the key bluestones were transported by land and sea on a journey from the Preseli mountains in south-west Wales to Wiltshire.

Geologists and archaeologists have long supported the 216-mile epic-trek theory, despite the Herculean effort that would have been involved in moving 80 stones, each weighing around four tons, with little more than muscle-power.

But according to a book being published next week by one of the foremost authorities on stone circles, the epic trek almost certainly never happened.

The stones may well have been taken from Wales to Wiltshire, but it was ice-age glaciers that carried the rock, rather than prehistoric man. The builders of Stonehenge, about 4,600 years ago, simply used what had become local stone.

Aubrey Burl, an archaeologist who has studied stone circles for more than 30 years, rejects the idea that the Welsh stones were chosen because of their magical powers, and says there is irrefutable evidence that the same kind of Welsh stone was on Salisbury Plain before Stonehenge was built. He also lists evidence in the Yale University Press book, Great Stone Circles, of glacial deposits - known as erratics - of the Welsh stone along a line between Presili and Wiltshire.

Stonehenge is made up of two types of stone, sarsens from the Avebury area 18 miles north of Stonehenge, and a mix of dolerites (bluestones) from the Preseli mountains. It was the geologist Herbert Thomas who in 1923 linked the bluestones with the Carn Meini ridge of the Preseli mountains. "Since that time it has been popularly accepted that the stones could only have reached Salisbury Plain by human effort,'' Mr Burl said.

But he added that research showed that prehistoric societies did not move massive blocks from any great distance. "When there was convenient stone they used stone. When there was not they used timber or earth,'' he said.

At Stonehenge, "the discoverers [of the stones] may have ambitiously planned a concentric circle for the 83 holes, but when the last bluestone was unearthed and the countryside scoured no more were found ... [and] the scheme was modified into a less impressive single circle of about 57 stones. Even in the golden age of prehistory there could be blunders, and Stonehenge was no exception.''

5 Great Stone Circles, published next week by Yale University Press, pounds 19.95.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in