Court upholds US cockfighting ban, rejects challenge in Guam
A U.S. appeals court has affirmed a ban against cockfighting in U.S. territories
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
A U.S. appeals court ruling Wednesday affirmed a ban against cockfighting in U.S. territories.
A panel of 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges ruled against a Guam businessman whose 2019 lawsuit argued the ban was unconstitutional. Sedfrey Linsangan said in his lawsuit that “gamefowl raising and competition” is part of his “culture, custom and tradition."
In 2018, former President Donald Trump signed a law banning all animal fighting in U.S. territories. The law took effect in 2019. Prior to the law, cockfighting had been illegal in the 50 states but not U.S. territories.
Linsangan appealed after a U.S. judge in Guam denied his motion for a preliminary injunction against the prohibition.
Linsangan didn't immediately respond to a text message from The Associated Press seeking comment on the latest ruling.
Attorneys representing the United States in the case didn't immediately respond to an email from the AP.
The ruling said Linsangan failed to show that cockfighting is a fundamental right.
“Linsangan’s evidence of cockfighting as a cultural practice both predating and outside of American history does not show that cockfighting is objectively deeply rooted in our Nation’s tradition," the ruling said.
The U.S. Supreme Court in October turned away a challenge to the federal law brought by individuals and organizations that argued Congress exceeded its power in applying the ban to Puerto Rico They noted that “cockfighting is deeply ingrained in the island’s history, tradition and culture.”
The Animal Wellness Action said it hailed the ruling because it came days before Guam cockfighting derbies advertised for New Year's Day.
___
This story has been corrected to show that the animal welfare group that hailed the ruling is Animal Wellness Action.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.