Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Computer program beats human race at draughts

Andrew Brown
Friday 26 August 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Another weighty blow against humanity was struck yesterday when a computer program retained its title as world draughts champion in Boston, writes Andrew Brown.

Chinook, a program developed at the University of Alberta in Canada, kept its title after drawing with Don Lafferty, the second- best human player, by one game each with 18 draws. Chinook had won the title last week, when the best human player, Marion Tinsley, came down with a bug after six drawn games and resigned.

Mr Tinsley had dominated the game for 44 years, losing only nine competitive games, two against Chinook in 1992. In 1991, he resigned his human championship to play the computer. He apparently felt human opponents were too boring.

Professor Jonathan Shaeffer, who led the team that programmed Chinook, said their victory was historic: 'In years to come we're going to see machines beginning to dominate man in many more areas considered exclusively human.'

But Professor Shaeffer expressed bitter disappointment over the circumstances of his victory. 'Tinsley is the best. The title is meaningless to us. It only means something if you win it against the best,' he said in an email message.

The programming team hopes to arrange a rematch with Mr Tinsley in the autumn.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in