Complacency over rural heritage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.valuable agricultural land from irreversible development, it was claimed yesterday. The Council for the Protection of Rural England said the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food had, between 1988 and 1995, failed to object to planning applications involving development on farmland over 10 times the size of Bristol.
And over the same period, Maff objected to applications for development on less than 25 per cent of the highest grade agricultural land and less than 20 per cent of land involving the top three grades.
"The figures reveal Maff's continuing complacency towards protecting even our best farmland," said the CPRE rural affairs officer, Gregor Hutcheon. Maff's relaxed attitude risked squandering a vital and precious finite resource, he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments