COMMUNITY CARE / Disabled face 'secret care rationing': Study finds staff exploit ignorance of clients
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SOCIAL SERVICES staff responsible for assessing people's needs under the new community care system are secretly rationing services they consider would be too expensive or difficult to provide, and failing to record when needs cannot be met, a survey published yesterday claims.
Financed by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the study examined assessment practices involving disabled people in a metropolitan borough and a shire county.
The report says: 'The means by which social service workers ration the care and services available are often covert, making it impossible for disabled recipients to challenge them.'
The researcher, Kathryn Ellis, from Birmingham University, found:
There was a strong temptation for practitioners to use most users' lack of knowledge as a way of limiting the assistance on offer.
Disabled people who appeared knowledgeable were labelled
'demanding'.
Among the services assessors were especially likely to try to ration were home care and occupational therapy.
Practitioners overestimated the preparedness of the users' relations and social network to provide informal care.
The report said: 'Those turned down felt humiliated, angry, or cynical about the claims of community care.'
Squaring the Circle: User and carer participation in needs assessment, Joseph Rowntree Foundation pounds 6.50
Modest expectations, page 10
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments