Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clocks to dictate Y2k baby contest

Cherry Norton
Friday 23 July 1999 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE MUCH-HYPED millennium baby boom will cause more chaos than already predicted unless clocks are set accurately, according to two paediatricians.

Couples racing to have a baby on the stroke of midnight on January 1, 2000 could miss out on lucrative media deals if their hospital has not kept its clocks in order. Many couples tried to conceive during the first week in April to ensure their baby had the best chance of being the first to be born in the 21st century.

Although proof of being the "first baby" born in the new millennium relies on an accurate labour-room clock, a letter to the British Medical Journal from Dr Jonathan Round of Gravesend Hospital in Kent and Dr Nigel Kennea of St George's Medical School, London, said they had found the clocks were often wrong.

They conducted a study of the clocks in their labour ward, where 2,600 babies are born each year, and found that all six clocks were slow by an average of 94 seconds.

"Most parents expect the clocks to be accurate and might be surprised if their babies become five minutes older during transfer to a neonatal intensive care unit from the labour ward," they said. But seconds are vital to couples vying for first place in the millennium baby race.

Louise Silverton, deputy general secretary of the Royal College of Midwives, said: "If parents are concerned about the accuracy of the clocks they could take radio in with them and listen to the Greenwich pips at midnight."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in