Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clinton Scandal: Witnesses say they saw Clinton in the act

Mary Dejevsky
Monday 26 January 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Bill Clinton's future looked increasingly uncertain yesterday as reports circulated of witnesses who caught him and Monica Lewinsky in flagrante. Mary Dejevsky reports from Washington.

According to ABC television, "corroborating witnesses" have been found who caught the President and the then 21-year-old trainee, Monica Lewinsky, "in an intimate act" in the White House.

But in tape-recordings made by a confidante, Ms Lewinsky maintains that no one ever caught her with President Clinton or knew of presents she says he gave her. The tapes - obtained by Newsweek magazine - have Ms Lewinsky admitting to oral sex and late-night telephone sex sessions with the President and agonising about her decision to deny the affair.

The most damaging aspect of the scandal so far has been the accusation that Mr Clinton tried to persuade Ms Lewinsky to deny any relationship. That, rather than the alleged affair, was seen as the one issue that, could bring him down. The new evidence, however, believed to be in the hands of the independent prosecutor, Kenneth Starr, would throw doubt on the President's veracity.

Ms Lewinsky's lawyer, William Ginsburg, did the rounds of the American television talk shows yesterday and said that she would "absolutely, unequivocally" tell the full story about her relationship with Mr Clinton in return for immunity.

He said Ms Lewinsky stood by her affidavit in which she denied the relationship. But sources have indicated that she would be willing to change her story in exchange for immunity.

The television networks also showed clips of Ms Lewinsky being greeted by Mr Clinton at a rally shortly after his re-election in 1996. Ms Lewinsky appears adoring, but - as commentators stressed - Mr Clinton's feelings were impossible to judge as his cordiality is an integral part of his political persona.

Detectives from the FBI searched Ms Lewinsky's flat on Saturday, taking clothing, jewellery and her computer. Her lawyer said they were looking for proof of her relationship with Mr Clinton, including a dress that might provide DNA evidence of a sexual encounter.

Mr Clinton maintained his silence yesterday, but the White House went into more combative mode. Ann Lewis, communications director, was one of several senior officials to appear on the talk shows to defend the President, forcefully repeating his initial denials.

Not all Mr Clinton's allies were so supportive, however. His former chief of staff, Leon Panetta, told the San Jose Mercury newspaper that if the accusations had any truth in them, it would be better for the Democrats "if Al Gore became President and you have a new message, a new individual up there". Another erstwhile ally, George Stephanopoulos, Mr Clinton's former spokesman, also betrayed doubts. He said: "If he is telling the truth, he can survive. If he isn't, he can't."

A dozen or so White House advisers, contacted by CNN, were reported as saying that "the R-word" - resignation - was a real possibility, though a White House spokesman denied it had been mentioned. He also denied reports that the annual State of the Union address, scheduled for tomorrow, could be postponed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in