Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cholesterol tests unlikely to save lives

Jeremy Laurance
Wednesday 25 February 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CHOLESTEROL screening is unlikely to save lives and can be misleading or even harmful, a report says today.

People who discover they have a raised cholesterol level in their blood may even start to feel ill - simply labelling them as "high cholesterol" may cause them to "adopt the sick role".

Two-thirds of GPs offer some cholesterol testing and one survey showed that 28 per cent of people aged 45-64 had had their blood cholesterol screened in the last three years.

A review of research on the role of cholesterol in heart disease says that although it is an important factor, by itself it is a poor predictor of heart attacks. Most men who have heart attacks have a level at or below the average of 6 mmols per litre. Focusing on cholesterol may distract from bigger risks like high blood pressure.

The study, by the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, a government- funded agency, says that cholesterol-lowering drugs do save lives among patients at high risk - smokers, or couch potatoes - but are not appropriate for people whose only risk is a raised cholesterol level.

Cholesterol-reducing drugs are expensive and spending on them has risen more than fivefold since 1993 to pounds 113m. Other drugs which can cut the risk of heart attacks, such as aspirin, are cheaper and should be tried first, the report says.

One drug, Lovostatin, is set to come off patent next year which could bring a sharp fall in its price, saving the NHS millions. But Lovostatin is only licensed in the US and its manufacturer, Merck, Sharp and Dohme, has no plans to license it in the UK because it would be a rival for Simvastatin, also made by MSD, whose patent runs until 2008.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in