Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Children were held as slave labourers, report says

Gary Finn
Friday 17 December 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CLAIMS THAT a privately run care home used children as virtual slave labourers, physically and sexually abused them, were almost certainly true, an investigation by social services inspectors concluded yesterday.

The inquiry into Barlavington Manor children's home, in Petworth, West Sussex, was launched by Kensington and Chelsea council after receiving complaints that children it had sent there to be cared for had in fact been victims of a cruel regime.

The council, which sent children to the privately run home between 1966 and 1984, commissioned the 145-page report after allegations by 12 former residents emerged last year.

The 12 alleged that the proprietors of the home verbally humiliated the children, provided an unacceptably low standard of food and clothing, and used children as unpaid or low-paid labour to support their own affluent lifestyle.

The reportconcluded that the proprietors and at least one staff member were not suitable people to look after children in public care.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in