Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cherie Booth in plea for gay rights

Wednesday 09 July 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Barrister Cherie Booth QC made a heartfelt plea for equal rights for lesbians and homosexuals. The Prime Minister's wife went to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg to condemn discrimination which she says contravenes European law. Ms Booth was representing 29-year-old Lisa Grant, of Eastleigh, Hampshire, a railway booking clerk with South-West Trains.

The company says Ms Grant's live-in lover Jill Percey cannot have travel concessions worth about pounds 1,000-a-year because they are only available to husbands, wives and "common law opposite-sex" spouses of workers. Ms Booth told the court that the travel concessions were recognised as part of Ms Grant's pay. She was discriminated against because her predecessor in the same job - a man - was granted the travel concessions for his female partner.

But Patrick Elias QC, for the Government, refuted Ms Booth's argument, pointing out that there was no sex discrimination by South-West Trains, because a homosexual couple would have been treated the same way an interim "opinion" of the court's advocate-general will be delivered on 30 September, with the final verdict delivered next year.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in