Charities' rival to the lottery to be banned by Home Office
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Home Office is set to quash a plan by some of Britain's leading charities to set up a rival national lottery scheme run from public houses. The Pronto Lively lottery scheme, which is due to launch at the end of this month, has the backing of 25 charities, including Mencap, The Samaritans and ChildLine, and involves draws taking place at five-minute intervals.
Last night Lord Mancroft, the chairman of InterLotto, the company behind the plan, said the decision to block the new lottery could cost charities pounds 100m a year. The Conservative peer attended a meeting yesterday with George Howarth, the Home Office minister, at which he said he was warned the scheme could "change the face of British pubs entirely".
The new game, which is due to take place at 2,000 outlets around Britain, would cost players pounds 1 for each draw. The results of each draw would be displayed on a screen above the bar in pubs. Prizes would be small compared to the National Lottery, with a jackpot of pounds 25,000.
Stephen Lee, director of the Institute for Charity Fundraising Managers, said he was "extremely concerned" by the development.
The Gaming Board had raised objections on the basis that it was dangerous to mix gambling and alcohol. The scheme had also been criticised by Ladbrokes.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments