Channel freight plan dropped
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The company behind a pounds 3bn Channel Tunnel freight project rejected by MPs said last night it was withdrawing its application for outline backing.
The announcement by Central Railway came two days after the Commons threw out the plan for a new freight line between the Midlands and the Channel Tunnel amid widespread public opposition.
But the company denied this was the end of the plan to use disused and new rail routes to allow container trains to run every few minutes between the Channel Tunnel and Leicestershire.
The company said: "Following its rejection in the House of Commons, Central Railway considers it responsible to announce today that it has decided to withdraw its application.
"The company has no further comment to make at this stage."
Opposition to the line had focused on property blight, but operators and users of passenger services affected by the project had also objected.
More than 13,000 people living along the route lodged objections, and a 20,000-strong petition was handed in at Downing Street.
On Wednesday, MPs voted 172 to seven to reject an Order that would have allowed plans by Central Railway to go before a public inquiry.
Earlier, the Railways minister, John Watts, had said such a vote would mean the scheme, which came under a barrage of fire from MPs on both sides, was "effectively dead".
Mr Watts said the Government was neutral about the project, although it approved of the principle of moving more freight by rail.
The scheme would have used the trackbed of the old Great Central Railway to link a freight terminal at Lutterworth with London, with new tracks alongside other lines on its way to the coast.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments