Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Channel 4 to defy ruling on violence

Paul McCann Media Correspondent
Wednesday 30 July 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Channel 4 has attacked the television standards watchdog for ruling against a scene in the harrowing Ken Loach film Ladybird Ladybird and has said it will show the film again uncut.

The channel was forced to air the Broadcasting Standards Commission ruling about the film last night, but in a statement the channel's chief executive, Michael Jackson, described the BSC as extremist and arbitrary.

The BSC said violence and language in the film was "beyond acceptable boundaries" because of a scene where a man beats up his partner in front of her child. Forcing the channel to air its adjudication on complaints about a programme is the BSC's strongest sanction.

Mr Jackson said: "Channel 4 is very concerned that the BSC should take such an extreme view of a distinguished feature film by one of Britain's most outstanding contemporary film-makers, Ken Loach.

"The channel was proud to back this film and transmit it," he added. "And will be equally proud to repeat it in due course. The violence and strong language were necessary in the telling of a distressing story and the channel would not consider cutting it. It is at least reassuring that the BSC has no power to prevent repeats, otherwise such an arbitrary finding could deny British viewers such a critically acclaimed film."

Channel 4 preceded the 10pm broadcast of the film in November last year with two warnings about the content. The Independent Television Commission, which can fine broadcasters and withdraw their licence to broadcast, was satisfied with the warnings and has told Channel 4 the film does not breach its programme code.

Broadcasting the BSC adjudication will cost the channel several thousand pounds in lost advertising, but it maintains it is most angry about the challenge to artistic freedom.

Mr Jackson said: "We are disturbed by the recent trend for the BSC to hand down value judgements about cinematic works that have been responsibly scheduled with clear warnings." Yesterday the BSC said it was not seeking to ban the film but believed there was a strength of public feeling about the depiction of domestic violence and re-stated its belief that the scenes went too far.

"The BSC respects Channel 4's integrity on this," said a BSC spokeswoman. "Genuine dispute is infrequent. In 40 per cent of upheld cases the broadcaster has offered a statement agreeing that there was a problem with the material." Ladybird Ladybird, nominated for a film of the year award in 1995, tells the true story of Maggie, a Liverpudlian pub singer in London fighting to stop social workers removing her children.

Disgusted of C4, The Tabloid

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in