Changes urged in negligence claims ases
HEALTH: Consultants to be subject to same disciplinary procedures as rest of NHS, while a faster system is urged for victims of poor treatment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PATIENTS WHO suffer injuries through medical negligence should no longer have to go to court to prove their case, a senior High Court judge has recommended, in proposals being considered by the Department of Health.
Lord Justice Otton, a leading medical negligence judge and chairman of the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, has instead called for a new medical negligence body to be run on similar lines to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority.
Lord Justice Otton said: "Parents rarely succeed in proving negligence but suffer great financial hardship in rearing such children." Under his plan, patients would have to show only that their injury was because of what happened in the hospital and not prove a doctor's negligence.
He said many judges relied on expert testimony to guide them. "Judges are not equipped by their training, expertise or experience to carry out risk benefit analysis," said Lord Justice Otton. He added thatmany hospitals "sit on" claims in the hope that the claimant will give up their case.
Under Lord Justice Otton's three-stage scheme the amount of compensation would be fixed by a panel of doctors rather than lawyers.
Claims under pounds 10,000 would first be considered by a clinical risk manager for the hospital, who could recommend the level of compensation.
Claims between pounds 10,000 and pounds 500,000 would be dealt with by a medical injuries compensation authority.
Very serious cases would go straight to that body, which would also decide whether the hospital should pay.
The British Medical Association welcomed the proposals.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments