Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Census case that led to head count halt heads back to court

A month after a Supreme Court decision let the Trump administration end the 2020 head count of every U.S. resident, the case that propelled the ruling is heading back before a federal judge with advocacy groups and the Trump administration at odds over how to proceed

Via AP news wire
Friday 13 November 2020 14:38 GMT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A month after the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to end the 2020 head count of every U.S. resident, the case that propelled the ruling is heading back to a district court Friday, with advocacy groups and the Trump administration at odds over how to proceed.

A coalition of local governments and advocacy groups that sued the Trump administration for trying to end the once-a-decade head count a month early is asking U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California to make the Census Bureau revert to a previous plan pushing back until next April the deadline for turning in numbers used for divvying up congressional seats among the states.

The plaintiffs said in court papers that the Census Bureau's rush to finish the count in order to meet the shortened deadline violated its duties under the Constitution and forced census takers to cut corners, jeopardizing the accuracy of the count and leading to an undercount of Black, Latino and Native American communities.

More time is needed to crunch the numbers and correct for any errors, they said.

The coalition says the count was shortened to make sure the numbers-crunching takes place while President Donald Trump is still in office so that his administration can enforce his desire to exclude people in the country illegally from the numbers used for determining how many congressional seats each state gets for a decade to come. Three separate federal courts have ruled Trump's order unlawful, but his administration is appealing.

The Trump administration has asked the judge to dismiss the coalition's lawsuit or put it on hold, until either Trump reports the apportionment numbers to Congress or an appellate court rules on an earlier order by Koh.

Koh's preliminary injunction in September halted efforts by the Census Bureau to finish the head count at the end of September, allowing it at the time to continue until the end of October. It also allowed for the Census Bureau to turn in to the president the apportionment numbers at the end of next April rather than at the end of December.

However, Department of Justice attorneys appealed, and the Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration a month ago, allowing it to end field operations for the 2020 census. An appellate court for the time being suspended the part of Koh's order dealing with the Dec. 31 apportionment deadline.

In court papers, Department of Justice attorneys on behalf of the Trump administration said the court shouldn't get involved with day-to-day census operations that could interfere with the Census Bureau's efforts to meet the congressionally-mandated Dec. 31 deadline. They also said any claims of harm are premature.

“The Supreme Court’s order staying this Court’s previous injunction makes clear that Plaintiffs are not entitled to interfere with the Bureau’s work to complete the 2020 census," Department of Justice attorneys said.

___

Follow Mike Schneider on Twitter at https://twitter.com/MikeSchneiderAP

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in