Cabinet fears gag over union cash
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Cabinet Office is reviewing the rules that dictate the conduct of ministers in order to take into account the money paid by trade unions to local Labour parties.
The protocols - called Questions of Procedure for Ministers - do not at present refer to union payments. This has effectively barred ministers from making public pronouncements on disputes involving trade unions because of the money paid out to individual constituency Labour parties.
At present, the Cabinet Office rules state: "Ministers should take care to ensure that they do not become associated with non-public organisations whose objectives may in any degree conflict with government policy and thus give rise to a conflict of interest."
The rules have already presented problems. Glenda Jackson, the junior transport minister whose Hampstead and Highgate constituency received pounds 2,000 last year from Aslef, the train drivers' union, should, under these rules, refrain from commenting on the dispute between Connex South Central and its Aslef employees.
But a spokesman for Ms Jackson's office denied that she had been silenced adding that "there was no conflict of interest".
To date, Ms Jackson has not issued a statement regarding the strike - which affects thousands of commuters in the South-east. The Cabinet Office, however, does recognise the problem. "This issue does need to be resolved and will be accounted for through the current revision," said a spokeswoman.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments