World Bank questions the wisdom of free capital flows in emerging markets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE WORLD BANK called yesterday for a debate on the need for capital controls on investment in developing countries in the aftermath of the Asian financial crisis.
The Bank admitted that capital liberalisation could carry risks for emerging markets.
Fred Kilby, the author of the World Bank's annual report on financial flows in the developing world, said: "There may be a case for looking at whether it is feasible or desirable to place some constraints on short- term capital flows."
The comments will guarantee a reassessment of the IMF's drive for further liberalisation of global capital markets is high on the agenda next month, when the two institutions hold their half-yearly meeting in Washington.
Yesterday's report highlighted the controls introduced by Chile in 1991 and Colombia in 1993. These in effect tax loans of short maturities. Studies suggest they have tilted borrowing towards long-term loans.
Private capital flows to developing countries reached a new record last year of $256bn (pounds 155bn). The rich OECD members cut their aid budgets from $59bn in 1996 to $55bn in 1997 or 0.25 per cent of GDP.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments