Wool price hits Leeds performance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LEEDS GROUP, the fabric printer and yarn dyeing company, pushed profits ahead despite losing production at one factory and suffering from sharply lower wool prices, writes Robert Cole.
Pre-tax profits were 16 per cent higher at pounds 2.9m for the six months to 31 March. Turnover climbed 4 per cent to pounds 21.7m.
Robert Wade, the chairman, said the group had been chasing sales at the expense of profit margins. The figures are distorted by the wool price, which has fallen by 31 per cent in the past 12 months.
Profits were held back by a fire, caused by arson, at the Walsden plant, West Yorkshire. The fire interrupted what promised to be a strong performance by the factory. A full insurance settlement is awaited.
Earnings per share rose 14 per cent to 10.8p. Leeds usually lifts the dividend in line with earnings but the company paid a little more (an 18 per cent improvement to 2.75p) to compensate shareholders for Budget changes that affected them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments