Whitehall rejects calls for FSA curbs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT has rejected calls for major curbs on the powers of the Financial Services Authority, insisting that advice from prominent QCs is that these do not breach the European Convention on Human Rights, writes Andrew Garfield.
The Treasury yesterday wrote to the joint committee of both houses of parliament which last month criticised the lack of safeguards in disciplinary proceedings, saying that it is satisfied with the Financial Services and Markets Bill as it stands, although it has accepted the need for a few minor amendments to the clauses covering so-called market abuse, particularly as far as the use of evidence given under compulsion is concerned. The Treasury minister, Patricia Hewitt, is to go before the committee on Wednesday to explain the Government's view that the Bill is "fundamentally sound".
Yesterday's response comes barely a fortnight after the committee warned that the sweeping powers being given to the FSA could violate the human rights convention and fatally undermine the Government's goal of creating a one-stop-shop for financial regulation.
The committee was particularly concerned about sweeping powers being given to the FSA to levy fines on those who have committed offences such as insider dealing, without recourse to the criminal courts.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments