Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wembley to vote on stadium's future

Tuesday 09 March 1999 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WEMBLEY YESTERDAY pledged to go ahead with a shareholder vote on Thursday that will decide the future of the famous stadium, rejecting a call for the vote's postponement.

SFK Entertainment, a US operator of entertainment venues, had sought a postponement of the meeting in the hope of securing more interest in its own approach. It has expressed an interest in bidding for Wembley at around pounds 220m, or 400p per share, if the board grants it more detailed financial information. It has two days to make a formal bid or risk the rival plan being approved by shareholders.

The rival plan, which has split the Wembley board, would see the stadium sold to the Football Association for pounds 106m in a deal that would see the twin-towered landmark re-developed as part of a bid to stage the 2006 World Cup. The proposal is backed by Wembley's executive directors.

But the non-executives, which include veteran sports promoter Jarvis Astaire, have written to shareholders suggesting they oppose the plan. They believe the company risks losing its identity if it sells off the stadium. Wembley should at least secure a contract to run the main venue as part of any sale agreement, they say.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in