Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Waterglade director 'sees no future'

James Bethell
Wednesday 19 October 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WATERGLADE director Anthony Midgen said he could not see any future for the company after yesterday's announcement that the board would not be justified in opposing a winding-up petition issued by HM Customs & Excise due to be heard on November 9.

Mr Midgen had previously said he intended to recapitalise the company after he and four others, led by the Singaporean financier Wilson Ng, took control of the board on September 13.

However, he said he was shocked to find that the company appeared to have liabilities of pounds 29m, of which pounds 21m is owed to banks, secured against assets worth little more than pounds 9.5m. 'The degree of indebtedness was considerably more than we had been led to believe, though we expected a surprisingly large figure,' he said.

Mr Midgen said that he and the other directors who moved onto the Waterglade board had received no information from the previous board about the extent of indebtedness. 'We had requested this information as long ago as June.

That information was not forthcoming, so we had to take the action we did,' he said.

The old board of Waterglade has denied that incoming board members were not properly informed of the precarious nature of the company's finances. 'The new directors knew the financial details of the company and had discussions with British Linen Bank on the Thursday morning before they decided to go ahead,' a spokesman for the old board said.

He said the new investors were given a full underwriting proof from the bank.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in