Waterford in the clear
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WATERFORD Wedgwood, the luxury products manufacturer, returned to the black in 1993, recording profits of Ir pounds 10.1m ( pounds 9.8m) before tax against an Ir pounds 17m loss the previous year, writes John Murray.
Most of the improvement came from a radical restructuring at Waterford Glass, where the workforce has been cut by a third and wage cuts were introduced. The 1992 results were struck after a pounds 16.6m restructuring charge.
Operating profits were 80 per cent higher at Ir pounds 16.5m. Waterford contributed most of the rise, with Wedgwood profits remaining flat. Richard Barnes, group finance director, said the improvement at Waterford had come both from operational savings and stronger sales.
There is no dividend but Tony O'Reilly, chairman, hinted that the group would return to the dividend list this year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments