Water costs `should be passed to customers'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE WATER regulator yesterday called for the power to pass on to customers any unexpected cost increases the industry may incur under the Government's plans for regulation of the privatised utilities.
Ian Byatt, the director-general of water services, said that the so- called "error correction mechanism" proposed by the Government should work both ways.
"A system under which customers receive the benefits of unexpected changes to specific factors outside the companies' control, yet shareholders bear any losses, would increase the cost of capital which would result in higher bills," Mr Byatt said in response to the Green Paper on utility regulation issued in May.
The electricity industry has already called for the error correction mechanism to be discarded because it will increase the cost of borrowing and could be a back-door way of clawing back what the Government felt to be excess profits.
In his submission, Mr Byatt also says that a minimum number of specific and pre-defined factors should have to apply before the error correction mechanism could be used to claw back revenues from the water companies.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments