Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Warning from Vaux against interference

Peter Rodgers
Thursday 09 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Any further interference with the tied-house system could lead to the demise of the British pub as we know it, Sir Paul Nicholson, chairman of the Brewers and Licensed Retailers Association, has warned.

Calling the surprise investigation by the Office of Fair Trading into wholesale beer prices a "total over-reaction", Sir Paul said the announcement on Tuesday had already caused enormous damage - with Vaux, his own company, losing £40m in value. On the stock market Vaux shares have slipped 12p to 216p since the OFT investigation was announced.

Share prices of most regional brewers fell yesterday as a belief grew among investors that the effects of the price inquiry could spread well beyond the big five companies at which it was originally thought to be aimed.

Sir Paul said the reaction of association members at a council meeting yesterday was, "Oh Lord, not again - this is the 33rd inquiry since 1966."

There was also a sense of frustration because "what the customer puts on the bar for a pint gives the best value in Europe". The more the Government interfered with the market the greater the disbenefit to the customer, he said.

Sir Paul attacked the purist view that vertical integration in the industry was wrong and described the idea that brewers could be prevented from owning the properties through which they supplied beer as a simplistic solution that would be to the detriment of customers.

Forms of tied-house agreements were as widespread in many countries of the EU, particularly Germany, as in Britain.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in