View from City Road: Think again on lottery secrecy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nanny knows best, says Peter Davis, the new National Lottery regulator. Mr Davis is insisting on a blanket confidentiality clause that will prevent anyone tendering to run the lottery publicising details of their bids. He is worried that the public will find the details 'confusing' and that he will find himself at the centre of a public debate.
But why should he be worried? He maintains that there is not the faintest prospect that his decision will be influenced by lobbying by vested interests. True, he mumbled something yesterday about 'commercially sensitive information', but that will scarcely do: it is perfectly feasible to produce outlines of the proposals.
If discussion was appropriate during the recent television and radio franchise awards, it is much more so where the lottery is concerned. This bidding process is not only - or even mainly - about money. It is about the type of lottery Britain wants. Mr Davis should be eager to gauge public reaction: they are the customers who will ensure whether it is a success.
All this smacks of secrecy from the worst of motives - a secrecy designed to make life as comfy as possible for anyone taking decisions, such as Mr Davis. But he should think twice. Given the number and nature of those interested in participating in the bidding, details will undoubtedly leak. It would be better to have a well-informed debate than a distorted one.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments