View from City Road: Suter suffers from mark of Abell
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.INVESTORS were wrong to jump to the conclusion yesterday that David Abell, the chairman of Suter, had been cleared of all wrongdoing and the cloud of suspicion had been lifted from him and his company with the publication of the long-awaited DTI inspectors' report. The share price rose 6p to 125p yesterday but it may fall back once the detail has been absorbed.
True, the inspectors found no evidence of a concert party. But they did say that the relationship between Mr Abell and Michael Somerset-Leeke, then a stockbroker, 'was similar to that which the legislation relating to concert parties seeks to prohibit'. They proposed changes in the law to cover cases where two people are dealing together so one of them can acquire shares in a target later. This suggestion should be adopted by Neil Hamilton's company law review.
The report provides good reason for saying Mr Abell should no longer run a public company. The most damning fact is that he bought shares in Metal Closures for himself 20 minutes before he bought further shares in the company for Suter. He compounded his misdemeanour by giving contradictory statements to the inspectors that were not only inconsistent with each other but with an affidavit he had given earlier.
It is, however, a pity that it took the inspectors so long to produce their report even if much of the delay was due to secretive Swiss banks. During the four and a half years since the inspectors were appointed much damage has been done. Companies with which Suter was once compared have surged ahead. The only way forward for Suter now is for Mr Abell to step down.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments