View from City Road: Sugar offers a bitter deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALAN SUGAR has little respect for outside shareholders in Amstrad, his troubled consumer electronics company. He sold shares in March 1991 at 72p each, making a pounds 34m profit, and now, at the bottom of the economic cycle, he wants to buy them back and take the company private at just 30p a share.
He might like to think he has shareholders over a barrel but they should put up a fight. Relations between the City and dynamic entrepreneurs such as Mr Sugar have never been easy.
Institutional shareholders saw the way Mr Sugar was going long ago and deserted the share register. As a result the overwhelming majority of Amstrad's equity - besides Mr Sugar's 36 per cent - is held by private investors, some of whom have a personal loyalty to Mr Sugar.
With no big institutional shareholding, there is little firepower available to them to turn down the offer. They do not even have non-executive directors to protect their interests, although Kleinwort Benson has been hired as independent adviser.
It is admittedly hard to see how the buy-out can be turned down flatly. That would run the risk of Amstrad being managed by, at best, a de-motivated management under its founder and largest shareholder. The alternative is to negotiate improved terms.
Stockbrokers estimate Amstrad's net asset value at around 45p a share, of which about 20p reflects a pounds 100m-plus cash pile and the balance unsold stocks whose market value is unclear. Even so, 30p represents far too big a discount to net assets. Whatever shareholders' fate, the suspicion remains that Mr Sugar is likely to do well from the deal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments