Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View from City Road: Sound, fury and not much else

Wednesday 25 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

After all the heat generated by the creation of the Personal Investment Authority, the parliamentary report on financial services regulation seems surprisingly modest in its demands. But the real surprise is that the Treasury select committee managed to agree long enough to produce any report at all.

As was abundantly clear at yesterday's launch, the committee was hopelessly split. The eight MPs present might have been talking about eight different reports. Brian Sedgemore, the Labour warhorse who refused to sign the report, railed that the committee's decision-making was disgraceful, sleazy and undemocratic.

Recriminations flew back and forth. Mr Sedgemore walked out, calling Quentin Davies, the Tory MP, a public school wimp. Mr Davies accused his opponent of displaying 'an unedifying mixture of frivolity, malice and self-advertisement'. Somewhere in the midst of all this was a much tougher set of reforms proposed by Barry Legg, a Conservative.

He wanted the PIA to become a designated agency directly reponsible to the Treasury, with a majority of its board given over to non-practitioners such as consumer and Government representatives.

These sensible suggestions - which would have gone a long way to meet the objections of the PIA's opponents - received the majority backing of the committee. And yet, for reasons too incomprehensible to relate, the final version of the report reverted to the more modest original. As a result the PIA and the Securities and Investments Board had little difficulty in welcoming the main thrust of the report - its endorsement of a single retail regulator. Rather a case of much sound and fury signifying nothing.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in