View from City Road: Sir Michael says he is sorry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Despite the apology of Sir Michael Graydon, the chief of the Air Staff, to the Chancellor and the Chief Secretary, many people will remain suspicious about whether the Treasury did indeed indulge in underhand tactics during the public spending round.
For the first time in many years, the defence budget suffered critical scrutiny even in Conservative newspapers. But Sir Michael is being super-sensitive if he supposes that the nascent public debate is anything more than a reflection of the reduced threat to these islands thanks to the end of the Cold War combined with the reduced circumstances of the exchequer.
The Government is facing a borrowing requirement worth 8 per cent of national income at a time when defence is taking 4.1 per cent of national income, a higher share than that of France at 3.4 per cent or Germany at 2.2 per cent. The last substantial review of defence spending - Options for Change - took place in 1990, before the full scale of the Soviet collapse had been appreciated.
There is no reason to believe that the Treasury relaxed its normal rule, which is that it never briefs the press during public spending rounds. The Treasury simply does not believe that public debate helps the control of public spending, since it merely excites special interests.
Indeed, the Treasury is probably the Whitehall department least committed to open government. Should Sir Michael or anyone else doubt this, we can assure him that we asked the Treasury for a briefing. And we were refused.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments