View from City Road: Politics prejudices reform of tax bias
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The efficient movement of money from those who have it to lend to those who need it to invest is central to the operation of any capitalist economy. But it is hampered in Britain because returns on savings can be determined as much by the way they are taxed as by their underlying performance.
Some forms of saving, such as contributing to a pension scheme, receive tax concessions - an effective subsidy. Others are treated less favourably, for example bank and building society accounts. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, in a new report, argues that the barnacles of the tax system should be stripped away so that different types of savings are treated as far as possible in a neutral way.
The IFS recommends the creation of an Extended Personal Equity Plan (Expep) in which any financial asset could be held, and in which savings from taxed income would be exempt from any further taxation. On the same principle, the IFS argues that the cost of equity finance should be deductible from corporation tax in the same way as debt interest.
Removing biases from the tax system is almost always a worthwhile pursuit on economic grounds. Alas, the political gains are less clear; the beneficiaries of tax breaks can be vocal and powerful opponents when their subsidies are threatened.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments