View from City Road: Pearson's weak point
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
Hard to argue with Pearson's decision to refashion itself as a coherent media group rather than a poorly focused conglomerate. Hard, too, to fault the swiftness with which it has shed assets such as Camco and spread into synergistic areas such as computerised entertainment.
But while the multi-media strategy is now largely in place, that only serves to draw attention to the group's weak point - television. Pearson needs to add delivery systems - satellite, cable or terrestrial broadcasters - to programme makers like Thames. But it is frustrated at every turn, not only by the prices being demanded by the likes of TVB's shareholder Robert Kuok, but by Britain's cross-media ownership rules, which limit it to small stakes such as its holding in the ITV broadcaster Yorkshire-Tyne Tees or its BBC tie.
The essence of Pearson's reorientation is the idea that it will deliver its 'content' in any form the consumer wants. Unless the Government, which is dragging its heels, can be persuaded to liberalise the rules, the Grand Design will remain incomplete.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments