View from City Road: Maxwell players try to leave past behind
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It would perhaps be churlish to suggest that the pounds 40m settlement between the Mirror Group Pension Trustees and Invesco, Lehman and Capel-Cure Myers is better for MGN shareholders than for the Maxwell pensioners.
The trustees were, after all, seeking pounds 200m, which included a hefty claim for damages against the institutions for not 'blowing the whistle' on Robert Maxwell's activities. And the settlement will only contribute about pounds 8m to non- Mirror pensioners of the Maxwell empire, or about 4 per cent of the latter's outstanding claims.
For MGN, however, pounds 32m in cash for its pension fund is certainly a shot in the arm, though an indirect one - as it reduces a future obligation on the company to support the fund.
Why then did the MGN share price not respond? The answer is that there are a number of bigger issues affecting MGN, including the price war with News International, the possibility that it will have to repay pounds 75m of government support for MGN pensioners, and the proposed consortium offer for Newspaper Publishing, owner of the Independent.
The main benefit of yesterday's settlement to MGN was to put yet further distance between the company and the Robert Maxwell saga. Invesco and Capel-Cure Myers both cited the potential damage that a protracted trial could cause them as an important reason to settle. Yesterday's announcement shows how important the threat of bad publicity can be to institutional behaviour.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments