View from City Road: Making the small fry count
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Stock Exchange could halve in size without any significant loss of value. This apparent conundrum is a truism because half of all quoted companies account for 98 per cent of the market's value and volume. The rest barely count. Their shares rarely change hands, they are poorly researched and they cost too much to deal in.
The exchange has tried, and failed, to improve liquidity. First, it persuaded a handful of market-making firms to promise that two of them would make markets in each and every company, however small. Volumes stayed stubbornly low. Then it allowed only one market-maker per stock. Volumes were unchanged. Then it introduced a bulletin board allowing would-be investors to advertise their interest. Volumes failed to rise.
Six months later it is replacing the bulletin board with the Stock Exchange Alternative Trading Service (Seats). This will combine the last two systems - single market- makers and the bulletin board. Why they should work better together than they did apart is hard to see.
Plainly, the Seats launch was not enough for UBS Phillips & Drew, which chose yesterday to announce plans to stop market- making in about 200 stocks. It is also making 15 staff redundant. P&D was following Warburg and County in cutting back their exposure to smaller companies.
The only hope is that the exchange's concessions will persuade other market-makers to continue using their capital in this market. Market-makers will have sight of agency crosses - deals between agency brokers - and will not have to disclose deals until the next day. These rule changes please Winterflood Securities, one of the most vocal critics of current arrangements.
While that may take the pressure off the exchange, it will not make much difference to investors. Two things are needed to encourage them to buy shares in tiny companies. Costs of dealing should come down. The spreads - the difference between the bid and offer prices - represent 14 per cent of a small company's share price against 2 per cent for an FT-SE 100 stock.
More importantly, there would be more interest in these companies, which are predominantly domestic, if the economy were stronger. The introduction of Seats has done nothing to change that.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments