View from City Road: IFS report adds fuel to Dorrell's fire
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.That Institute for Fiscal Studies report on dividends should send a few shivers down the spines of City institutions. Some are already wondering what the dividend-obsessed Stephen Dorrell, financial secretary, is up to with his review of taxation and savings.
The IFS, in a paper by Stephen Bond and Coastas Meghir published in Fiscal Studies, says two trends in the past 20 years have been damaging to the level of investment by UK companies.
One is the reform of corporation tax in 1984, which raised the level of tax paid by companies. The other is the favourable tax treatment of dividends under the advance corporation tax system introduced in 1973. Tax-exempt institutions such as pension funds prefer profits to be paid as dividends rather than retained.
If Mr Dorrell and his boss, the Chancellor, are looking for justification for another go at pension funds and ACT, the IFS has written that bit of the budget speech for them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments