View from City Road: Hot seats in the boardroom
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BOARDROOMS have suddenly become uncomfortable places. No longer are they the havens they once were, full of quiet corners in which non-executive directors could go to sleep.
Each day there is news of the departure of yet another chief executive or chairman. In the past four days alone there have been announcements about Sandy Saunders of Sunleigh, Lord Stevens of Invesco MIM, Brian Disbury of Mosaic Investments and Tony Millar of Albert Fisher.
Recession is partly to blame for the stream of departures. In most cases their companies have run into trouble and the boss is carrying the can.
In some cases non-executive directors have stepped in to speed up the process. They are intervening more often, safe in the knowledge that this is what a growing number of institutional investors expect of them.
It is no surprise that the Confederation of British Industry is ambivalent about the role of non-executives. The CBI represents industrialists whose periods of office are being brought to a sudden end by those same non-executives. They have every reason to be worried by the trend.
Chief executives should have an uncomfortable time if they underperform. This is the risk they take when they accept the job and the pay that goes with it.
The CBI should be more concerned that all too often chief executives who underperform are cushioned by generous pay-offs that look like rewards for failure. This does the industrial community no good at all.
The CBI should encourage more of its own members to become non-executives of other companies and see what the job looks like from the other side of the boardroom.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments