View from City Road: Fresh vision needed on media regulation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peter Brooke, the National Heritage Secretary, ought to sit down with a blank sheet of paper and ask himself how he would regulate the media industry if he were starting from scratch.
And he could do worse than considering the problem in the round - cross-media ownership, ITV ownership, local radio regulation, and the BBC's charter, which expires in 1996. At present, each issue is being looked at in isolation, which makes little sense in an era when Rupert Murdoch is busy building a digital highway in the sky and BT is plotting to offer quasi-television services on the telephone line.
The simplest answer would be a minimalist approach. It is ironic that after 14 years of Conservative government, the media industry in the UK labours under more complex and nonsensical regulation than any of the former national monopolies.
The great ITV debate ought to be solved by sweeping away all controls on ownership; the 'local' element of national broadcasting can best be protected by specific rules about programme sourcing and content. The same should apply to local radio.
What sense is there in a regulatory structure that forbids a group like Emap from owning a national newspaper and local radio stations, but allows a company like News International to have BSkyB, the satellite channel, plus a goodly chunk of Fleet Street?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments